4 ms·
I guess I should not be surprised that the HN community doesn't really seem to care. Intel put the Management Engine into every CPU with no choice from consume
by some_account 8y ago
I guess I should not be surprised that the HN community doesn't really seem to care.
Intel put the Management Engine into every CPU with no choice from consumers to opt out. That alone is fairly surprising, since they knew it was a big chance it would have exploits and consumers would have no defense.
But nobody reacts. Nobody cares.
- rrdharan 8y agoI'm curious what would you consider to count as an acceptable "reaction" from the HN community? At any rate I'm unlikely to provide one. Personally I probably won't care until a Snowden-like disclosure that demonstrates exploitation of the ME in a scenario that directly affects me. i.e. I wouldn't be surprised that nation states are exploiting this in targeted fashion, but nation states already have all kinds of ways to get my data in ways that I'm unlikely to be available to defend myself against if I'm targeted. I'd be more interested in hearing about how ME vulnerabilities are being used in US State-level dragnet surveillance or perhaps to subtly manipulate the population by changing their Google/Twitter/Facebook results or something of that nature. If you find any evidence of that, let me know.
- nine_k 8y agoImagine: "We, the U-Boot Command, don't care about fears and rumors until an exploit of the Enigma encryption technology is actually demonstrated." A good exploit is kept as invisible as possible, and when it is publicized, it may already be game over. A Trojan usually takes a lot of measure to stay undetected. Much of the recent crop of router-targeted exploits did not manifest their presence to the users in any way. Even with Snowden revelations, what has been shown was not just illicit mass data collection, but also huge reams of data already illicitly collected.
- turblety 8y agoI'm not sure nobody cares, there are a lot of people who do care and (like me) refuse to buy Intel products. I think the problem is there is no other competitor. Both Intel and AMD (or possibly a three letter agency) have colluded to ensure there are locked management engines in all of their products. Also people just don't understand what the ME actually is. It is surprising the HN community who are mostly technical don't see just how atrocious it really is. One thing to note however, is I tell my none technical associates there is a second computer in their laptop. It runs software meant to remotely control their computer. They they can not remove it, they can not see what it does, and there's frequently security bugs found in it. When I tell them this I get told I am paranoid and being stupid. However when I ask them to just imagine if it was true, wouldn't it be awful, they mostly agree. The issue is people really don't want to know the truth. It reminds me constantly of a quote from the matrix: "Many of them are so injured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will that they will fight to protect it."
- Kliment 8y agoI care. I removed ME from mine. I'd prefer to use a competitor but the only viable one is AMD and their equivalent tech is less documented and no known way to disable it exists. Disabling/removing ME is possible for intel stuff so intel is actually the better choice if this is important to you.
- bogomipz 8y agoMight you have some documentation or resources on the procedure for removing/disabling the ME?
- _emacsomancer_ 8y agohttps://github.com/corna/me_cleaner/wiki/External-flashing https://github.com/corna/me_cleaner/wiki/External-flashing