Because I think that people have a right not to be secretly filmed let alone being published on the Internet. For me it seems a natural thing that doesn't need

Because I think that people have a right not to be secretly filmed let alone being published on the Internet. For me it seems a natural thing that doesn't need explanation. > a violation of reasonable expectation to privacy Probably. The customers expected that they just take a ride and are not being filmed. They don't expect that their face will be published on the Internet so that anyone can find their social network page and learn who they are. > if someone can legally record video, it's their copyright, and they can distribute it however they want to. It should not be this way. Wikipedia says that in some countries there are laws against this [1]. Of course, some laws could be written before Internet become popular so they need adaptation. This article [2] also mentions that surveillance can be regulated by laws. Finally, there are personality rights [3] although they are related to commercial activity. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_photography https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_photography [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_rights https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_rights