I found these bits quite entertaining: > the district court will need to develop a fuller record > Instead, it might consider directing the parties, who poorl

I found these bits quite entertaining: > the district court will need to develop a fuller record > Instead, it might consider directing the parties, who poorly served the court by treating the standards interchangeably, to file briefs addressing whether the standards are susceptible to groupings that are relevant to the fair use analysis. Pretty much calling out everyone involved on their laziness. I can imagine the judge shaking his head in disappointment when writing this opinion.