No, it should work the other way around. A violation of a law which, to be followed, requires knowledge of a secret, paywalled technical document, should be un

No, it should work the other way around. A violation of a law which, to be followed, requires knowledge of a secret, paywalled technical document, should be unprosecutable. It is a violation of a person's 4th Amendment right to due process to prosecute them under secret laws. If a law wants to reference a technical document, it should reproduce the text to be referenced in full, in the publicly available text of the law, and there should be rules governing this process.