3 ms·
One point that surprised me about those banned suits is that the drag reduction they provide is largely indirect. Instead, they're buoyant. They make the swimme
by sopooneo 8y ago
One point that surprised me about those banned suits is that the drag reduction they provide is largely indirect. Instead, they're buoyant. They make the swimmers float higher in the water leaving less of them in the pool to be dragged on. So for roughly the same reason you can't compete in the freestyle paddling on a surfboard, you can't use those suits.
Apparently they worked by other mechanisms as well, but the floaty aspect alone seems a reasonable justification for the ban.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-ban-full-body-olympics-swimsuits-a-scientist-explains-polyurethane https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-ban-full-body-olympics-swi...
- zhte415 8y agoYour comment reminded me of the 80s movie Running Man. There are no rules, there is only winning. Which is the antithesis to principles of competing fairly. And in Running Man there were undiscovered rules, but only ones to game the sport which came crashing down resulting in a loss of trust of the institution. Transparency is key for trust in sport and thus continuality of the larger body.
- specialist 8y agoI thought the only rule was to boost ratings.