3 ms·
> That's why they join networks that works directly with YouTube. They usually join networks more out of necessity than choice (from memory you get access to m
by cyphar 8y ago
> That's why they join networks that works directly with YouTube.
They usually join networks more out of necessity than choice (from memory you get access to more "perks" if you're with a network). Many YouTubers bemoan the existence of multi-channel networks because they take a lot of power away from content creators (even more than YouTube already does).
> When you look on that trending list [...]
These days it's pretty obvious that the trending list is effectively all paid promotions. It's not uncommon that content that has already gone viral is nowhere near the trending list (and the trending list is instead videos advertising new movies). In the "old days" of YouTube, the front page was hand-selected content that someone working at YouTube thought people would enjoy. These days it's all run by opaque algorithms.
> The last thing they want is more bosses and more logistics.
Given how many YouTubers are complaining about their current bosses being completely awful, I'd think the last thing they want is to continue with the status quo.