3 ms·
If The New York Times, a 166 year old newspaper with a tradition of fine reporting, can lose all its credibility over that ... I don't even know what to say. Yo
by Swizec 8y ago
If The New York Times, a 166 year old newspaper with a tradition of fine reporting, can lose all its credibility over that ... I don't even know what to say. You sound like a terrible customer and I'm sure they're happy not to have you?
- seiferteric 8y agoTo be fair they have some shady practices. They were forcing you to call to cancel for example. I am sure this works well for them to act as a deterrent, but it's still shady I think.
- Swizec 8y agoYeah that’s annoying, but going so far as them losing all credibility over that seems extreme.
- WillPostForFood 8y agoMaybe crediblity isn’t quite the right word, would you go for losing all good will?
- praneshp 8y agoI'm sure they prefer having another customer, and would probably try to educate them about principal vs principle. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/principal http://www.dictionary.com/browse/principal
- jopsen 8y agoSorry, auto correct.. I could also excuse myself as not being a native English speaker :) But I'll go with the autocorrect excuse in this instance..
- jopsen 8y agoAs all brokers say: "Past Performance Is Not Indicative Of Future Results". And okay, maybe it's not all credibility, but it certainly loose the ability to do business with me. Just go to nytimes.com, click subscribe, and try figure out what it's actually going to cost? Because I honestly can't figure it out.