3 ms·
Sure, if you ignore the data around wage stagnation, income inequality, accumulated wealth, etc. When you actually look at the data it tracks with another deve
by dandersh 8y ago
Sure, if you ignore the data around wage stagnation, income inequality, accumulated wealth, etc.
When you actually look at the data it tracks with another development, one often ignored (as you yourself did here): the decline of union participation and activism.
I distinctly remember a debate that occurred for a time under GWB around "values voters", with "the left" (broadly and generally speaking) asking why Americans voted against their economic interests in favor of "moral values" and "the right" (again broadly and generally speaking) arguing that for some "moral values" hold more weight than economic interests.
I mention this because there is a deliberate attempt to remove responsibility of blue collar workers from their plight. All those guys you mentioned? Yea, they were elected. GHWB on the strength of being Reagan's VP, Clinton was re-elected after NAFTA and his VP Gore won the popular vote, GWB won in 2004 on the strength of "values voters", etc.