3 ms·
Calling it a "codified Consumer Bill of Rights" makes it sound like you want it to be a law, but the second half of your statement makes it sound like you want
by wilsonnb2 8y ago
Calling it a "codified Consumer Bill of Rights" makes it sound like you want it to be a law, but the second half of your statement makes it sound like you want it to be like the "certified humane" label on the eggs that I buy.
I have no problem with it being an optional label, but I see no reason it should be enforced legally.
- AdmiralAsshat 8y agoYeah, maybe not the best naming convention. It might be easier to call it a "reverse privacy policy": what we want you to do with our data. I envision the agreement would be non-binding--it would simply be a list of things we the Consumers want our companies to agree to. The companies can then say yes, we agree to follow your guidelines (perhaps introduce some third party to "certify" that the guidelines have been followed if companies start lying about it).