4 ms·
dunno. seems a lot of wasted water, you can't recirculate it or you'd be back to square one. maybe if it's activated with a pressure plate of sort it'd be more
by LoSboccacc 8y ago
dunno. seems a lot of wasted water, you can't recirculate it or you'd be back to square one.
maybe if it's activated with a pressure plate of sort it'd be more environmentally friendly.
- osrec 8y agoOr a motion sensor perhaps?
- Faaak 8y agoMaybe the water is changed every day. It would still be useful as the large (lets say 2m³) volume of water would slowly begin charging up with contaminants
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- dangerbird2 8y agoAt that point, you'd need to treat it with chlorine, and it wouldn't be much better than the pool itself. Probably better to just use good greywater recycling techniques for shower waste.
- gm-conspiracy 8y agoWhy do you think it is being wasted? It isn't being contaminated, and will eventually wind up back in the water supply.
- werdnapk 8y agoIt is definitely being contaminated and won't end up back in the water supply until it's retreated (which is not free).
- jessaustin 8y agoIf it's not washing something off, what's the purpose of it?
- herbst 8y agoI've seen things like these a few times and all were motion activated. However in practice they almost always run because of the amount of people.
- wongarsu 8y agoYou can likely set it up to recirculate 99% of the water directly, and sending the other 1% off for treatment. With water circulating that quickly removing a small fraction each circulation should still keep it very clean.