First of all, I was not presenting it as fact. Merely as a possibility and something to consider. Second, I read the disclosure, and all it does is point out t

First of all, I was not presenting it as fact. Merely as a possibility and something to consider. Second, I read the disclosure, and all it does is point out that it is a possibility and not a fact. It also points out that the intelligence agencies have not provided any hard evidence that Russia was behind the leak, and they are the same groups who lied to the public about WMDs in Iraq to justify that invasion. This article also says that the original reports were published by Consortium News, the source I linked to.