3 ms·
Yeah, there are a few nuances to latency numbers. The 250ms pure read-react time deals with arbitrary events, but when we can chunk reactions into a practiced
by annywhey 8y ago
Yeah, there are a few nuances to latency numbers.
The 250ms pure read-react time deals with arbitrary events, but when we can chunk reactions into a practiced technique our precision goes way up, to nearly the individual millisecond: thus musicians can play rapid passages with unusual rhythms in time if they have time to plan and prepare, but they lose this ability if dealing with unusually high latency(extreme reverb, amp across the stage, digital audio with huge buffer sizes). The technique, after all, is based on fast confirming feedback that your execution is correct.
And like you say, "bouncy" latency is even more disruptive. We can adjust to a small and consistent lag, but inconsistency will degrade any level of skill.
- azernik 8y agoAgreed on all counts. > And like you say, "bouncy" latency is even more disruptive The technical term for this is "jitter". Networking and telecoms people pay a lot of attention to this metric, both for the reasons you cite and because jitter is much more noticeable than high-but-constant latency in voice or video communications.