3 ms·
We have yet to see proof, only allegations. Clinton was under investigation for more than just Benghazi. As for Deflecting it's the driving force behind, he sh
by ganoushoreilly 8y ago
We have yet to see proof, only allegations. Clinton was under investigation for more than just Benghazi.
As for Deflecting it's the driving force behind, he shouldn't have won, she should have, so no unlike the others it is relevant.
- untog 8y agoNone of what you said addresses the fact that Trump directly appealed to a foreign power to hack his opponent, all you've done is thrown out a few whataboutisms. Not interested, sorry.
- jonhendry18 8y agoYou're ignoring all the contacts with Russia by Trump campaign figures, their deceptions about those contacts, etc.
- ganoushoreilly 8y agoYou can find just as many relationships with the Clinton's of questionable origin (China, Middle East). Both Candidates suck, Trump's a moron, but to think that Hillary's actions didn't create a circumstance for exploitation is throwing it out the window. The Russians do not like her, to think they wouldn't put forth efforts to meddle through social media manipulation is a joke. Hell, if you think we're not doing it to other countries that's a whole other argument.
- oxide 8y agoI don't think being laser-focused on who as opposed to what and why is relevant or helpful by any means.