3 ms·
Redistribution is always from the rich to the proletariat. “To” not “by”. I’ve pointed out that the proletariat is, on average, less expert and trained. You may
by anbende 8y ago
Redistribution is always from the rich to the proletariat. “To” not “by”. I’ve pointed out that the proletariat is, on average, less expert and trained. You may disagree with this point, but I haven’t redefined anything.
Instead, I’ve attempted to point out some ramifications of extreme equality.
This is very different than having a strong social safety net..,
- dragonwriter 8y ago> Redistribution is always from the rich to the proletariat. No, it's not. Redistribution in the other direction is possible, and redistribution where the parties are not “the rich” and “the proletariat” are possible.