4 ms·
Frankly, "contents" substituting Java for JVM are pretty worthless. Notwithstanding, the article seems to be either confused about what it wants to fork, or it
by rue 16y ago
Frankly, "contents" substituting Java for JVM are pretty worthless. Notwithstanding, the article seems to be either confused about what it wants to fork, or it does indeed want to fork Java in addition to the JVM.
Either way, not a stellar effort.
- adambyrtek 16y agoThe article mentioned OpenJDK, which contains JVM, but overall I agree that I wouldn't this call to action particularly inspiring.