3 ms·
Is this really an issue? The applicant seems to be "in violation" of an established, company policy of stating "that hair, facial hair, beards and general groom
by haasted 16y ago
Is this really an issue? The applicant seems to be "in violation" of an established, company policy of stating "that hair, facial hair, beards and general grooming must be neat, clean and trimmed".
He was obviously not rejected due to his religion, but due to not adhering (or wanting to adhere to) a policy that was in place prior to his application.
Note: I have absolutely no objection people having dreads, and would have no trouble with colleagues having it. I merely believe that a company should have a freedom to say "no thanks" to applicants not wanting to fit in the existing rule framework.
Also, it ticks me off slightly that he uses religion as a way to gain sympathy for his complaint.
- tptacek 16y agoRequire his dreads to be neat and clean, then move on. You can no more dictate hairstyle than you can dictate that men be clean-shaven; whether or not it's your established "rule framework", it's going to get you sued by the first litigious Muslim candidate you reject, and rightly so: modulo hygiene, employee hairstyles are none of your business.