Clearly you didn't reach the conclusion. First, because the conclusion is not "Java sucks", but rather "Most of these things, while not kosher, are unlikely to

Clearly you didn't reach the conclusion. First, because the conclusion is not "Java sucks", but rather "Most of these things, while not kosher, are unlikely to happen in practice." Second, because the author didn't just leave it at criticising the language — he opened a bunch of bugs in the OpenJDK tracker.