I don’t know, it sounds like he’s trying to not judge as much as possible, only removing posts actively promoting harm or harassing. And what’s the alternative

I don’t know, it sounds like he’s trying to not judge as much as possible, only removing posts actively promoting harm or harassing. And what’s the alternative to Zuck? Should Facebook be controlled by the U.S. government? A panel of elders? When is it okay to dismantle a company in these such cases? Who makes _that_ judgment?