4 ms·
In your response, you first wrote about a benefit provided by your employer and then equated it to universal / single payer systems. Do you understand the diffe
by tathougies 8y ago
In your response, you first wrote about a benefit provided by your employer and then equated it to universal / single payer systems. Do you understand the difference between the two?
- toomuchtodo 8y agoI don’t make a distinction between the two, as the benefits provided by either system should be at parity with each other. We’re just haggling over the overhead involved (wrt employer provided vs single payer).
- tathougies 8y ago> the benefits provided by either system should be at parity with each other You say they 'should be' but do not justify it. In order to claim something 'ought' to be some way, you need to justify it. Not that it really affects your non-existent argument, but the government of the United States does not agree with you. For example, closely held corporations are not required to pay for drugs they morally disagree with, whereas the government can't make these distinctions, as long as the drug is legal.
- toomuchtodo 8y agoAppreciate the feedback!