3 ms·
If only you were manipulating second only. You would also be manipulating metre, candela, and ampere, assuming old definition of SI, or metre, kilogram and kelv
by anticensor 8y ago
If only you were manipulating second only. You would also be manipulating metre, candela, and ampere, assuming old definition of SI, or metre, kilogram and kelvin assuming new definition of SI.
- smt88 8y agoCan you explain how the duration of a second affects the metre?
- supermdguy 8y agoNot OP, but "The metre is defined as the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum in 1/299 792 458 second" - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre
- smt88 8y agoBut in that case, doesn't the "second" constant change (or the coefficient) and a metre remains the same length?
- supermdguy 8y agoA meterstick would remain the same length, but the SI meter's length would change.
- mockingbirdy 8y agoThe duration of a second is defined using Caesium-133 [1], not using anything else like daytime or rotational speed. It's independent of such factors and will always be the same in a given frame of reference. No need to update those values. edit: I think it will lead to the same or more problems because everyone would have to change all time-related constants. Easier to add a second to the day constant (because the day constant is a subset of the seconds constant, but the seconds constant affects many more aspects than just the day constant). [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_caesium#Caesium-133 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_caesium#Caesium-13...