3 ms·
In the 40s? Probably not, no. This was a relevant and useful book when it was published — https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Million_Random_Digits_with_100,000_N
by pdpi 8y ago
In the 40s? Probably not, no. This was a relevant and useful book when it was published — https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Million_Random_Digits_with_100,000_Normal_Deviates https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Million_Random_Digits_with...
Generating randomness is hard, and a recent concern.
- kragen 8y agoOne of the useful things about that book was that using it provided evidence that you didn't choose your "random" numbers through some tricky process designed to produce a certain nonrandom result.