> Why not just say, "hey, I prefer React, but it's good Vue exists for folks who prefer a different approach.". Vue's existence isn't a threat to React. It's ok

> Why not just say, "hey, I prefer React, but it's good Vue exists for folks who prefer a different approach.". Vue's existence isn't a threat to React. It's okay to have multiple approaches to the same problem. Because I keep seeing folks extolling the virtues of Vue, but when I went and used it I simply found little to nothing of merit compared to existing solutions. I'm not running around telling folks what to use here, but rather stating my experiences. Perhaps someone might come along and provide a reasonable explanation of how I misunderstood something or a problem it solves better than existing frameworks but all I get is "I look it and you don't so meh." In short, I'm trying to spur a technical discussion here but all I get in return is fanboyism and folks trying to shut down the conversation. > but the author didn't really criticize React in any way Actually, the author criticized React both in direct and indirect ways. He also made incorrect and or misleading claims. Of course the author also goes on the mention that he or she is inexperienced with React but somehow still feels qualified to make those claims. Sorry for trying to add to the discussion and not just posting "Oh gee, I sure do love Vue too!" > but I don't think a front end framework monoculture is a good thing Neither do I.