4 ms·
> For me this is a simple philosophical question. It really shouldn't be. It's a pragmatic question, based on what the likely outcomes and benefits or harms wo
by tomchristie 8y ago
> For me this is a simple philosophical question.
It really shouldn't be. It's a pragmatic question, based on what the likely outcomes and benefits or harms would be for deregulation.
> second of all it is a maturing experience.
Psychedelics put you at far higher risk of experiencing psychosis and other mental health issues. Don't rose-tint it as "maturing experience". You might not have an adverse response. Plenty have.
- blubb-fish 8y agoMy stance it to place the responsibility for educating yourself about LSD before taking it on an adult. If that adult doesn't do that - then that's no different to me from driving too fast and causing an accident or trying to climb a mountain without proper preparation and equipment. Adults have the right to die, to suffer and to harm themselves - I prefer to not get there. But I don't see why the state should base laws on this b/c this will also affect the freedom of me and others who act responsible.