3 ms·
That wasn't my point. I'm not talking about assigning blame on individuals in a company but to at least use the same principles when punishing companies as we d
by close04 8y ago
That wasn't my point. I'm not talking about assigning blame on individuals in a company but to at least use the same principles when punishing companies as we do with individuals.
A private individual is expected to return all illegal gains, pay additional fines, and possibly do prison.
But a company might be expected to pay fines that are actually a fraction of the profits made abusing the law. This means paying the fine is more lucrative business than ceasing the abusive behavior.
As such the system only gives the appearance that it's working when in reality it's just not bringing the expected benefits. If paying the fine and keep skirting the law is cheaper than fully complying than that's what companies will do.
- SparklingCotton 8y agoSince the EU wants Google to stop within 90 days, I assume they can give them a fresh €4.5bn fine if they refuse. At least that's something.
- close04 8y agoThat's definitely an incentive to stop once you were caught. But not really an incentive to not even do it in the first place. Easier to say sorry than to ask permission, right?