3 ms·
The n-person subgame Nash equilibria come from simple environmental constraints - the sheer number of people in India or China and the number of available seats
by dluan 8y ago
The n-person subgame Nash equilibria come from simple environmental constraints - the sheer number of people in India or China and the number of available seats in your commuter subway. The cost of not cutting the line is proportional to the number of participants. I'd argue it's a very different experience in say, Newcastle, UK where trains are historically on time, predictable, not as crowded, as opposed to trains in China being unpredictable, late, etc.
And, re: culture, well game theory tells us that free-riding is a learned outcome of repeated games. Singapore gets its past learning from a hundred years of British colonialism.
- linkmotif 8y agoThis is an interesting perspective. Thank you. > The cost of not cutting the line is proportional to the number of participants. But if people en masse don't cut in line, there's no cost at any scale, right? Imagine a culture where no one cuts in line. Then you don't lose by not cutting in line.