4 ms·
The laundering part is easy. A guy has $1M need to clean up. Release a $1000 app under account A. Buy the app 1000 times with account B, C, D, ... Account A
by ww520 8y ago
The laundering part is easy. A guy has $1M need to clean up. Release a $1000 app under account A. Buy the app 1000 times with account B, C, D, ... Account A earns legit money.
- dlhavema 8y agoWhat about the 30% comission the app stores take? What's the going rate for money laundering? :P
- ww520 8y agoWell, the money was illegal to begin with.
- duxup 8y agoThat does seem steep. The main article indicates methods that I suspect don't involve a 30% cut.
- westpfelia 8y agoNothing wrong with losing a little bit of money to make a lot of money. Even Pablo Escobar had to write off 10% of all his money due to rats eating it. I feel like these people are ok with giving Google/Apple a 30% cut if it means a platform is provided for them to make the other 70%
- justboxing 8y ago> Even Pablo Escobar had to write off 10% of all his money due to rats eating it. I didn't think this was true, but your statement checks out. Wow! > "Pablo was earning so much that each year we would write off 10% of the money because the rats would eat it in storage or it would be damaged by water or lost," Escobar wrote. Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/pablo-escobar-and-rubber-bands-2015-9 http://www.businessinsider.com/pablo-escobar-and-rubber-band...
- sushid 8y agoYou're making it sound like the credit card companies are idiots. If a huge portion of their stolen cards are buying an obscure app with a $1000 price tag, they're going to notify the authorities.
- white-flame 8y agoLaundering money means someone is using their own dirty money in a clean transaction, not further stealing others' money. This is all happening after the initial theft has taken place.
- chatmasta 8y agoCredit card companies don’t have product level insight. They would just see payments to “Apple Inc.,” hardly a rare occurrence for any customer.
- AngryData 8y agoWhy would the credit card companies even want to stop this? For every transaction they are earning processing fees, the only thing they need is a small amount of plausible deniability to shed any legal liability. They are basically being paid to look the other way.