3 ms·
To the downvoters, there is actually some historic and sociological evidence supporting this notion: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=320103
by sophistication 8y ago
To the downvoters, there is actually some historic and sociological evidence supporting this notion:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3201031 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3201031
> Recent research not only confirms the existence of substantial psychological variation around the globe but also highlights the peculiarity of populations that are Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic (WEIRD). We propose that much of this variation arose as people psychologically adapted to differing kin-based institutions — the set of social norms governing descent, marriage, residence and related domains. We further propose that part of the variation in these institutions arose historically from the Catholic Church’s marriage and family policies, which contributed to the dissolution of Europe’s traditional kin-based institutions, leading eventually to the predominance of nuclear families and impersonal institutions. By combining data on 20 psychological outcomes with historical measures of both kinship and Church exposure, we find support for these ideas in a comprehensive array of analyses across countries, among European regions and between individuals with different cultural backgrounds.
- pmarreck 8y agoThank you. My worldview is, far more often than not, based on evidence I’ve read. I hope HN does not turn into Reddit and “downvote for disagreeing with what is in fact true upon further examination”