5 ms·

This is a terrible, terrible decision. Knowing who's behind these groups is one of the only rays of sunshine that can be used to show a group's real motives. No

This is a terrible, terrible decision. Knowing who's behind these groups is one of the only rays of sunshine that can be used to show a group's real motives. Not being able to tell where the money comes is going to make dark money have even more of an impact in our elections, and give the very wealthy even more control.

crb002 8y ago
The only issue I see is money laundering. Under the First Amendment I could care less if Warren Buffett slaps a few billion down on a campaign. What I do care about is quid pro quo using donations to launder money into the coffers of purported campaign contractors.
- acct1771 8y ago
  What you care about, and what the public has a right to know, don't have to be the same.
- s73v3r_ 8y ago
  See, I completely disagree. I don't believe the first amendment means that money is speech, nor that a rich person is entitled to more speech than anyone else.