4 ms·

Unnecessary headline editorializing. Could we have it changed to the original?

• deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
• 1996 8y ago
  If you know why S3 does not work on some brands, the editorializing is not unwarranted. There was an active decision to remove working parts of the code. That is shameful.
  • gtirloni 8y ago
    Your other comment is the most upvoted right now because it brings useful technical information to the discussion on S0/S3 states. Anything else is just rehashing old arguments. Readers can take their own conclusions without being manipulated by incendiary editorializing.
  • rayiner 8y ago
    There is nothing wrong with throwing away obsolete code.
    • nixpulvis 8y ago
      It's not "obsolete"... S3 sleep mode uses much less power.
      • rayiner 8y ago
        On a properly designed system, the S0iX sleep modes should totally subsume S3.
• sctb 8y ago
  Yes, we've reverted the title from “ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018: S3 Suspend Workaround for Linux (shame on Lenovo)”. The guidelines are clear about this, so submitters should please follow them. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
  • fiji-flo 8y ago
    Sorry for this. I let my emotions get the better of me.
• nixpulvis 8y ago
  Shame for this is very warranted. Shame, shame, shame.
  • jryan49 8y ago
    Why? Do they even claim that their laptops support linux?
    • zaat 8y ago
      yes: https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/pd031426 https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/pd031426