4 ms·
> These were obtained by a government hostile to Qatar and passed to the BBC. Israel?
by philip1209 8y ago
> These were obtained by a government hostile to Qatar and passed to the BBC.
Israel?
- simbas 8y agosaudis?
- karimdag 8y agoEmiratis ?
- NeutronStar 8y agoIlluminatis ?
- readhn 8y agoKilluminatis?
- sctb 8y agoOne bad turn does not deserve another on this site. Please don't.
- oferzelig 8y agoSealand? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand
- sctb 8y agoSince you keep posting unsubstantively we've banned the account. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- rangibaby 8y ago> Shortly after the money was flown to Baghdad, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Egypt began their economic blockade of Qatar. They still accuse Qatar of having a "long history" of financing "terrorism".
- aaron695 8y agoIsrael would not work direct with the Post/BBC. It's pretty amature hour to do so. What about Tunisia, they share the mobile network, friends, but not happy about Qatar funding terrorists. I think it would be unethical for the Post to have worked with direct enemies of Qatar and not mentioned it. Their article doesn't say it's an enemy state, unlike the BBC. UAE have hacked Qatar before (Or outsourced it), but this is different and I can't see UAE working direct with the Post.