Yes, but given the context of the article, this did not seem to be an adequate representation of the other side. There is more to it than the idea of "a single

Yes, but given the context of the article, this did not seem to be an adequate representation of the other side. There is more to it than the idea of "a single true and authentic way to speak". I would say that a better way to frame it is "an organic coalescence into normative standards for better cooperation".