4 ms·
Um... "Viable" implies respectable, no?
by rfugger 16y ago
Um... "Viable" implies respectable, no?
- michael_dorfman 16y agoI was going to post the same thing. Ultimately, the key sentence he writes is: Do not release crap, and use minimum viable product as your justification. But do we really need to re-define MVP to say that?
- wccrawford 16y agoApparently so, since I've seen people talk about MVPs that didn't function. How is that an MVP? I even saw one comment that said someone had produced an MVP without a product at all.
- michael_dorfman 16y agoAn MVP without a product? That's called a Dry Test.