3 ms·
Replying to myself, I think we can take this further. I know she can see 6 or 8. She knows I can see 10 or 12. She knows that I know she can see 6, 8 or 10.
by mhandley 8y ago
Replying to myself, I think we can take this further.
I know she can see 6 or 8.
She knows I can see 10 or 12.
She knows that I know she can see 6, 8 or 10.
Given this information, we both know that the minimum number she can see that the other knows is 6. This allows us to both shortcut the process. We can both discard the first rounds that eliminate that she can see 2 or 4. The first round we need to play is the one where she can see 6.
So, in my first round, I'd give an answer if I could see 14. I don't give an answer, so she knows I don't see 14.
We both already knew that, but it was the first round we could agree on, so that's where we synchronize.
After that, you just play out the rounds as in the proposed solution.
Edit: doesn't work: if she had actually seen 6 rather than 8, she'd have known I'd see 12 or 14, so she'd know I knew she would see 4 , 6 or 8. So you can't synchronize on 6 after all.
- dooglius 8y agoBut you wouldn't give an answer if you could see 14, would you? You wouldn't know whether she sees 4 or 6.
- n4r9 8y agoI think your idea is pretty much the same as lucraft's below: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17548391 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17548391 and fails for the same reason.