> Here's the problem, there's an established 'story' and if someone tries to go against that established 'story' about human history, they will find themselves

> Here's the problem, there's an established 'story' and if someone tries to go against that established 'story' about human history, they will find themselves unemployable. Are you really dismissing an entire academic discipline because you believe everyone in it is collectively either dishonest or insane? This is the sort of reasoning that leads people to dismiss climate change or vaccination as grand conspiracies against the public. Huge claims require huge evidence. To entertain your claim I would expect you to produce not one but mountains of sources. Otherwise you're basically dismissing all of anthropology and archaeology as fake? What's more likely, given the evidence, that every academic professor is a nutjob or that you're wrong?