4 ms·
I own the Bose QC25 and have never really been happy with its capability to block human voices. Perhaps the QC35 are better. I also read that the Sony noise can
by dllu 8y ago
I own the Bose QC25 and have never really been happy with its capability to block human voices. Perhaps the QC35 are better. I also read that the Sony noise cancelling headphones (MDR-1000x and successors) have eclipsed the Bose ones in noise-cancelling quality. Anyhow, having to charge (or change batteries) for headphones every day is really annoying.
My current setup involves in-ear monitors (Massdrop x MEE Audio Pinnacle PX IEM) plus gigantic 3M Peltor X5A earmuffs on top of them [1].
I look ridiculous wearing the 3M Peltor X5A but it sends a strong message that I don't want to be disturbed, and they do a much better job than the Bose headphones at blocking human voices.
I have read that an alternative is to wear headphones on top of in-ear monitors, playing music on the IEMs and white noise on the headphones. This is the setup for Starcraft II professional gamers in tournament settings, for example.
[1] pic: https://pics.dllu.net/file/dllu-pics/20180716_151629.jpg https://pics.dllu.net/file/dllu-pics/20180716_151629.jpg
- mimimihaha 8y agoThe QC25’s are on sale right now for $120 which I’ve heard is insanely cheap. Do you still not recommend them for that cheap of a price? I was just about to bite the bullet on it.
- jolmg 8y ago> for $120 which I’ve heard is insanely cheap What? My earphones are $15. What do $120 headphones do to deserve being 8 times more expensive?
- rbinv 8y agoActive noise cancellation?
- jolmg 8y agoWhy the downvotes? Is my surprise at seeing $120 headphones considered as cheap somehow inappropriate for the site?
- pmarreck 8y agodownvotes for comparing headphones without active noise cancellation to headphones that have very good noise cancellation. until you try them, you wouldn't understand. and yes, that is cheap considering that NC headphones typically go for $299 and up