4 ms·
Hang on. Has there ever been a high performance fighter drone? All the UAVs I've seen aren't particularly agile nor fast. A remotely controlled drone might be l
by hangonhn 8y ago
Hang on. Has there ever been a high performance fighter drone? All the UAVs I've seen aren't particularly agile nor fast. A remotely controlled drone might be limited in its performance by the lag time in input and output (first relay sensor data to operator and then wait for controller input). It's one thing to remotely pilot a drone loitering over a battlefield at 100 to 200 miles per hour and quite another to do it when they're going twice or three times that speed (not to mention above Mach 1 and super-cruising). Therefore a high performance drone must by necessity be AI controlled at the local level rather than wait for operator input. I'm not convinced that we will have AIs that smart (in addition to being able to make various decisions that are literally life or death) before this plane is being deployed.
What you're proposing is basically trading one set of problems for another and 5th generation fighter planes have two, possibly three to four, working examples. A high performance fighter drone does not exist in reality as far as I know.
- Merad 8y agoYou're looking for the Boeing X-45 UCAV (test program completed mid-00s) and the Boeing Phantom Ray (current project).
- hangonhn 8y agoOh wow. That's super interesting. I see how they go around the problems I mentioned. Their AI don't need to do any crazy maneuvering because it's really stealthy so it's avoiding any sort of dog fights. All the actual fast maneuvering is done by the munitions, which already has enough intelligence to hit most targets. Brilliant. Totally not how I imagined the problem would be solved but my thinking simply removed the pilot and replaced it with an AI whereas Boeing moved the game to a different field with a different set of rules.