4 ms·
Interesting idea for a measurement! That amount of money can certainly buy an army, but doesn’t account for equipment, logistics etc. Comparing it directly to
by Engineering-MD 8y ago
Interesting idea for a measurement! That amount of money can certainly buy an army, but doesn’t account for equipment, logistics etc.
Comparing it directly to military expenditure by states is interesting [1,2]:
If spent over a single year it would be 3rd highest expenditure (second is China with 150-228 billion)
Could fund a military the same as France or Britain for 3 years
Equals the combined spend of Britain France and Germany over 1 year.
Could fund Greek or Swiss army for 30 years
Or Venezuela for 144 years
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_militar...
[2] https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/1_Data%20for%20all%20countries%20from%201988–2017%20in%20constant%20%282016%29%20USD.pdf https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/1_Data%20for%20all...
- sandworm101 8y agoIn many places soldiers can be had for far far less than 80k. In Africa or Iraq, $5k can buy you a man with a gun to follow you around for a year.
- Engineering-MD 8y agoDefinitely. You could spend twice the amount India does on military, and they have an army of 1.4 million