There is a difference between jobs lost from automation and technological advancement, and jobs lost from pointless policy decisions. I don't fall into any tra

There is a difference between jobs lost from automation and technological advancement, and jobs lost from pointless policy decisions. I don't fall into any traps. I did say some gov subsidy MIGHT be beneficial in order to get technologies that are merely being held back by economies of scale to where they need to be faster. Hardcore libertarians freak at this as well, but I'm a bit more case by case. For example, subsidizing solar panel production until it reaches price parity with natural gas, then start scaling back the subsidy very slowly.