> Definining "monad" as a thing for which monad laws hold is exactly the sort of almost-tautological non-explanation that makes people roll their eyes at FP afi

> Definining "monad" as a thing for which monad laws hold is exactly the sort of almost-tautological non-explanation that makes people roll their eyes at FP aficionados. Thank-you for crystallizing and articulating a frustration I have often, as a beginner to intermediate Haskeller.