4 ms·
Okay I’m glad to hear that I’m not the only one who found complicated boost libraries to be a total mess. I spent a while banging on managing those. Header-only
by hobls 8y ago
Okay I’m glad to hear that I’m not the only one who found complicated boost libraries to be a total mess. I spent a while banging on managing those. Header-only libraries tended to just work for me.
- stochastic_monk 8y agoI actually used Boost for a project, but I only needed header files for the subset I was using. I made each of these a submodule as in [0] and was able to benefit from Boost without all the pains of linking. So before deciding you can’t use it, see if there’s a way to make it header-only. [0]: https://github.com/dnbaker/frp/tree/master/boost https://github.com/dnbaker/frp/tree/master/boost