I guess the question you are begging is: how far can Lisp-LINQ go from the syntax, semantics, and ergonomics of C#'s LINQ before you stop calling it LINQ? Turi

I guess the question you are begging is: how far can Lisp-LINQ go from the syntax, semantics, and ergonomics of C#'s LINQ before you stop calling it LINQ? Turing completeness doesn't describe expressivity of source code, as far as I understand it - it describes the ability to produce a desired outcome. So yes, you can perform the same operations LINQ allows, in Lisp or any other Turing-complete language. But can you do it while giving the programmer the same (or a similar enough) experience? From the .NET docs: > Language-integrated query allows query expressions to benefit from the rich metadata, compile-time syntax checking, static typing and IntelliSense that was previously available only to imperative code. Language-integrated query also allows a single general purpose declarative query facility to be applied to all in-memory information, not just information from external sources. Now, to be fair, I'm not sure you can express all that in Haskell either. And it could be reasonable to argue that a few of those benefits (e.g. intellisense) just _haven't_ been done for Lisp, not necessarily that they _can't_ be done.