3 ms·
People love to beat up on these companies because of this stupid world cup prediction. Yes, Goldman is a giant vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity
by anonu 8y ago
People love to beat up on these companies because of this stupid world cup prediction. Yes, Goldman is a giant vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity (Matt Taibi quote). But it turns out it's really just great marketing for their research teams.
Also, I've seen some people say (not in this forum) that banks now look stupid because they're in the business of making predictions and they can't even get the world cup right. Guess what? Banks make no money on predictions. They make money on flows and taking spreads on trades they do with clients. Any research or prediction is meant to be a catalyst for that trade.
- chopin 8y agoI am pretty sure Banks make money on predictions if they get people on following them.
- anonu 8y agoYes... This is less a prediction and more a legal form of front running.
- throwawaymath 8y agoIn what way is this a legal form of front running?
- tedunangst 8y agoEverything Goldman Sachs does is front running and it's legal because they bribed all the regulators. QED.
- jasode 8y ago>Banks make no money on predictions. They make money on flows and taking spreads on trades they do with clients. You're mostly right but to further clarify, an investment bank like Goldman Sachs has revenue from mostly "market making" spreads but it does also have activities that depend on predictions such as their proprietary trading (before the Volcker Rule shut them down) and their GSAM (Goldman Sachs Asset Management) fund. The GSAM is basically a hedge fund for their wealthy clients' money. They will run predictions on macro trends on data like interest rates, commodities, indexes, etc to help them pick stocks for their portfolio. As the pdf noted, the World Cup data models and simulations came from Adam Atkins of GSAM.
- anonu 8y agoThe Volcker Rule shutdown approximately 0 amount of proprietary trading on wall street. Any articles you can point me to were merely media stunts by their respective firms. The rule was too complex and onerous to be implemtable. Case in point, it's already being rolled back... Certainly because of the current administration we're in. But more because it was just a poorly written and thought out idea to start with.
- ig1 8y agoThe line between marketing making and prop trading is blurrier than you think. Whenever you quote a price you're implicitly making a prediction on the future of the market.