4 ms·
The times wrote about a confidential document that was mistakenly released to the pulblic. The judge who sealed the document in the first ordered the times to r
by yadaeno 8y ago
The times wrote about a confidential document that was mistakenly released to the pulblic. The judge who sealed the document in the first ordered the times to redact their article which goes against decades of case law and arguably the first amendment.
Not only this but the Streisand effect seems to suggest that the court order will have the opposite than intended effect
- hkai 8y agoI agree that rare, isolated incidents like this one will have the Streisand effect. However, once this practice becomes routine, it will no longer be the case.
- king_nothing 8y agoYes and arbitrary state censorship via prior restraint is knocking on our doors right now. If this isn’t throughly thrown out with prejudice, things will only get much, much worse.