3 ms·
To me this sounds like much of the pedagogy I grew up with in the late 80's, which emphasized production values over clear presentation, or assumed that product
by rfrey 16y ago
To me this sounds like much of the pedagogy I grew up with in the late 80's, which emphasized production values over clear presentation, or assumed that production values were an indicator of quality of presentation.
The underlying assumption then was that "modern students" needed to be "entertained" or somehow spoken to "in their own language" whatever that is. Your points, especially "high quality audio/visual production tools are a must", echoes that sentiment to me.
All in all that seems to me more disrespectful to students than letting the subject matter speak for itself, and assuming that young students are as capable as we are of seeing the magic in geometry, or calculus, if it is correctly and clearly explained.
Edited: Also, producing 1600 videos puts him rather apart from others in the field, even those producing awesome graphics.
- johnohara 16y agoThis medium now allows for both: excellent production and clear presentation. If it's presented well the first time, it will always be presented well. The problem with production in the 80's and 90's was time and cost. High cost and long production time guaranteed the problems you point out. But the cost of high-quality production today is so low as to be non-existent. Production time is still a factor -- as it is in software development. Sal chose quantity over visual quality and hit the long ball. But c'mon, a Blue Snowball USB microphone is only $99 and produces crystal-clear audio.