I agree. The author of the post didn't require that the general's attack at the same time. They only had to reach consensus on whether to attack or retreat. Tha

I agree. The author of the post didn't require that the general's attack at the same time. They only had to reach consensus on whether to attack or retreat. That's what spooneybarger meant by: > The article incorrectly defines the two generals problem. > The [actual] problem states that the two generals have decided to attack but need to coordinate on when. Failure to attack at the same time will result in defeat.