4 ms·
I had a similar comment re. eventual consistency; and I think this is a case of eventual consistency. I think it doesn't work because the problem becomes "when
by nevi-me 8y ago
I had a similar comment re. eventual consistency; and I think this is a case of eventual consistency.
I think it doesn't work because the problem becomes "when to retreat". It actually introduces a third state (attack; retreat; do nothing), where I might retreat today, and you do nothing.
Out of interest, if you set a time/date on when to retreat, how would the message look like, and how would you define confirmation for both parties?
- FrozenVoid 8y agoContinuous synchronization is a solved problem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_Time_Protocol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_Time_Protocol