3 ms·
However, there is a difference, and I think an important one. With the internet, every piece of needed technology was either in place or easily imagined; with d
by Upvoter33 8y ago
However, there is a difference, and I think an important one. With the internet, every piece of needed technology was either in place or easily imagined; with driverless cars, I don't think anyone can claim that is true. While ML/deep learning have made impressive strides in the past years, it is still a big leap to say these same technologies are enough to drive a car in the wild. They may be, but it also may be many years until such a technology is realized.
- KKKKkkkk1 8y agoBut ML and DNNs are not supposed to be driving cars. The big players (Waymo and Cruise) are using DNNs only for perception.
- bobwaycott 8y agoIsn’t perception necessary for driving?
- mannykannot 8y agoIt is not sufficient.
- bobwaycott 8y agoThe comment to which I replied has been edited. Originally, it said ML & DNNs are neither necessary nor sufficient for driving, then proceeded to say they are only used for perception--hence my question that perception was necessary for driving (but obviously not sufficient).