4 ms·
I think this is a bit of a unique case because we're assuming up front that we know how the problem would be framed. In 2018, it would be odd to see a problem
by moduspol 8y ago
I think this is a bit of a unique case because we're assuming up front that we know how the problem would be framed.
In 2018, it would be odd to see a problem like this where people want pins shaped exactly the same way to be set up exactly the same way and that determine success for decades and decades. If (somehow, out of context) someone asked me for such a machine, I'd immediately be asking why not a different (or random) arrangement for a tougher challenge? Or for training? What about skinnier or fatter pins to control difficulty a little?
Those things only seem strange now because we're all accustomed to bowling being played exactly the same way our entire lives. If it were invented in 2018, I don't think it would look the same.
You'd almost be irresponsible as a software engineer to have someone explain what a bowling pin-setting machine should do, and then build it to do exactly (and only) that. For anything other than "bowling, exactly as specified," you'd be over-engineering an exact-fit solution only for your competitors to build something better and more extensible (with more bowling features / challenges) in six months.
- darkerside 8y agoHmm sounds like you've identified a terrific opportunity to disrupt the game of bowling! Or in less sarcastic terms, boring is an old, old game; the proof is in the pudding.