5 ms·
> I'm not sure how this logic works. If you have low-hanging fruit, you don't need genius-quality work. One of the things that got me thinking about this origi
by lionhearted 16y ago
> I'm not sure how this logic works. If you have low-hanging fruit, you don't need genius-quality work.
One of the things that got me thinking about this originally was reading that there were massive improvements in safety and efficiency in surgery when they started adopting processes and checklists from engineering.
Whoever adopted, tested, and perfected that made a genius quality contribution to medicine, but it was (relatively) low hanging fruit. I think it's more possible to make that sort of high impact, important contribution now than ever before.
> But then again, I'm skeptical of anyone that claims that genius is easy.
I wrote - "But honestly, I don’t think it’s very hard to do genius-quality work, if you decide to try. Most people don’t try. But if you did try, I think you could do some."
So I wouldn't say it's easy, but I don't think it's so hard either.
My feeling is that almost anyone could produce some really important works if they decided to try. How many people are trying, really? Everyone I know that's trying to do really important stuff is generally doing really important stuff.
> Plus, I do believe that there's more to it than hard work. Anyone can work hard, and I know plenty of hard workers who definitely don't do genius quality work.
But are they specifically trying to make large, permanent impacts on important fields? Repeatedly, persistently trying? Putting in hard work in boring, safe areas is unlikely to produce genius quality work. But looking at really hard problems or not-yet-done things and trying to do them? I think if you keep trying, you're likely to produce something of significant value.
Or maybe I'm mistaken, I don't know. But I generally see people who plant a flag and say, "I will try to do things that are massively important" - those people I see eventually making breakthroughs and contributions. I think a lot of people just don't plant that flag.
- j_baker 16y agoI say this fully aware of how hokey it sounds, but I'm going to say it anyway. Being a genius isn't a decision; it's a lifestyle. Maybe you are a genius, so it seems trivial to you. But the person who connected medicine to engineering probably did a lot more than say "hey, I wonder what would happen if I connected this to this". He probably had a good knowledge of both engineering and medicine. That takes a lot more than making a decision to do something smart. That's why I don't think that the average person is capable of doing genius-quality work. It's not that they don't want to change things. It's just that they don't want to dedicate their lives to it. And that is definitely understandable. In end, maybe you and I really agree more than we disagree. It's just that I feel that there's more to doing genius-quality work than the post presents.