3 ms·
Title saids Activists Are Alarmed, but it doesn't quote or say a single activist. Also, this happened during the Obama administration (who didn't have anything
by delbel 8y ago
Title saids Activists Are Alarmed, but it doesn't quote or say a single activist. Also, this happened during the Obama administration (who didn't have anything to do with it) and the article trys to slam it as a Trump administration with totally separate subject.
New York Times is NOT a reputable news organization. Yes, they once were, but ever since the whole WMD 2002 Iraq war, to me, they've been horrible. Yes occasionally they might have something good, that's how propagation works: you hide your agenda with things that make it neutral so that you can't distinguish between facts and agenda narratives, it also gives plausible deniability against critics. So whatever.
- bittercynic 8y agoI also thought this article was trash, but they also have plenty of articles that seem pretty well researched and informative. If you know of a news organization where every article is high quality, I'd love to hear about it!